How good it is to see Simon and Schuster post such positive figures in these troubled times. Of course it begs a number of questions, not least how long it will be that publishers can continue to pull long faces and mutter darkly about the Scylla of recession and the Charybdis of e-books.
It does rather leap from the page that "Simon & Schuster's operating income before debt and amortisation (OIBDA) more than doubled to $7m", which the publisher said "was driven by lower shipping, production and returns costs because of the increase in digital sales".
Despite recent attempts to distract us all with talk of piracy and other costs associated with e-books this clearly indicates that is a massive red herring. There are costs associated with e-books, but they are clearly insignificant compared to the benefits.
At one major publishing company that I know of, when editors draw up a profit and loss projection when they are considering acquiring a book there is no column for e-book costs because they are regarded as being functionally zero and are simply dumped on to the hard back costs.
Of course the conglomerates are not alone in realizing that they are on to a good thing. Amazon's poaching of Christopher Schluep from Random House to add editorial muscle to their publishing division is hugely significant news.
If there is any organization on the planet with a real understanding of the value of the e-book market it is Amazon and the fact that they are honing in fast on publishers' territory is the clearest possible indicator there could possibly be of the viability and potential buoyancy of the publishing business.
The conglomerates dog in the manger approach to the issue of e-books is doing them no favours. The day is fast approaching when a truly major international author will realize they are going to be greatly better rewarded by being published by Amazon because they will offer them a sensible share of the revenues they generate.
The failure to offer major authors equitable escalated royalty rates is damaging decades old business relationships. It is in everyone's interests to have a vibrant and independent publishing industry – Amazon publishing will likely always be subservient to the retail needs of its parent. But as the gap in potential earnings grows wider, appeals to loyalty look increasingly like they are motivated by self interest.
Recent blog posts
- Douglas Preston: On Amazon, Hachette, and Indie Authors
- Altbookstores for different readers
- Publishers must make a decision over subscription services
- #FutureChat recap: A busy workout in the subscription debate
- #FutureChat: Can subscriptions pay off for all kinds of books?
- BISG study: A buffet of digital book subscriptions
- The debutant's dilemma
- BitLit announces HarperCollins ebook bundling pilot programme
- #FutureChat recap: How can we ease the summer's debate?
- 10 questions about subscriptions with Andrew Savikas from Safari
30 min 14 sec ago
- "We're Not Taking Sides"
15 hours 40 min ago
- For Douglas Preston
21 hours 19 min ago
- An old post from the other
1 day 13 hours ago
- KU not for ME
6 days 15 hours ago
- Genre and the Howey AuthorEarnings reports
3 weeks 10 hours ago
- A couple of quick notes
3 weeks 1 day ago
- Incomes for self-pubs vs. trad pubs aren't equal
3 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
- I said
3 weeks 2 days ago
Tweets from @thefuturebook
TheFutureBook RT @Porter_Anderson: The #altbookstore group has its 2nd day, the dropcam here: t.co/cNYdoizF0w to start at 10aET t.co/IF9k1h…
TheFutureBook "Little bit betrayed": Douglas Preston on #Authors Unlimited & #AmazonHachette: t.co/Bh7LSN3xZm @TheBookseller #FutureChat Friday
TheFutureBook "Unfair of @Amazon to target #authors as...leverage." Douglas Preston ↬ @SarahMedway t.co/hIMefmMSxV @TheBookseller #FutureChat