Have publishers already lost the war over agency pricing?

Publishers would be wise today to keep one eye on an interesting debate over at the Guardian about agency pricing. Like me, I think the author Sam Jordison is an advocate of publishers setting prices in order to preserve a business model that might otherwise be toppled by sudden low pricing. But he is concerned that publishers may lose the battle legally, and that they have already lost the battle in the hearts of the consumers.

Certainly, if you read the comments below the piece, you'll find little sympathy for publishers. They are greedy, out of touch, luddites -- just plain wrong, in fact, and so there  . . .

The logic here is that because Stephen Leather is selling his Kindle books for 79p, and they are top of the Kindle charts, the rest of publishing is wrong. An e-book is worth what people are willing to pay for it, we are told, as if the same logic would ever be applied to other consumer items.

And yet, though we might want to resist it, something wicked is this way coming. The facts.

We know anecdotally from trade publishers, and thanks to my former colleague Katherine Rushton here, that publishers are experiencing strong growth in digital sales this year: and that it is not coming from the Sony Reader. Some are talking of digital sales reaching 10% by the end of the year, but privately they are even more bullish, especially those not on agency.

And yet as sales grow on the Kindle chart, prices are not rising. We know that Amazon has an interest in pushing e-books for 79p, even if it means raising prices further down the line. It clearly wants to win the argument first - at virtually any cost.

But even so, publishers such as Hachette, Harper, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster, should be getting their titles into the Kindle charts, even at higher prices. But I just checked the hourly Kindle chart, and there are no agency priced books in the top 20. The highest placed title is David Nicholls' One Day (Hodder/Hachette), which also happens to be the fourth most expensive Kindle Edition in the current top 50.

Furthermore, and this is even more worrying. The average price of paid-for books in Amazon's Kindle top 50 chart today is £1.79. It is little wonder Guardian commentators think e-books should cost less than agency publishers are making them available: they do.

Read some of the reviews appended to those self-published titles in the Kindle chart, and we could be forgiven for thinking that price has superceded quality in the minds of Kindle users. This is not just worrying it is tragic. Agency publishers have a limited period of time to prove Amazon wrong by getting their titles up the Kindle bestseller chart, before the OFT rules one way or another. The concern must be that by then, the war may already have been lost.

Tags:

Comments

Middle ground

Marte's picture

I don't think 79p is the right price for an ebook, as it wouldn't be enough to cover the cost of writing and producing the ebook in the first place, even if it sold a fair few copies - nevermind make a profit. But neither is £12.99 a fair price when the hardback costs £10.47 (The Fry Chronicles). I prefer paying a little less for my ebooks (i.e. 20-50p less) for the following two reasons: I can't lend it to my friends when I have read it and I can't donate it to a charity shop. I think publishers have got it wrong when they charge more for the ebook than the paperback/hardback currently available. Most of the ebooks I have bought so far have cost between £3.50 and £4.50, with a few costing £2.79 (low extent young adult novels). I think that's a fair price when the equivalent paperback is similarly priced.

I am afraid Mr Jones is, like

Howard's picture

I am afraid Mr Jones is, like so many insiders in the world of Big Publishing, totally misguided and wrong.

 

What planet exactly is Mr Jones living on when he says: "An e-book is worth what people are willing to pay for it, we are told, as if the same logic would ever be applied to other consumer items."

 

Excuse me but this is exactly how all other consumer items are sold. Price fixing is illegal across most of the Western world. Almost all consumer items are sold at a wholesale price and the retail price is set by the retailer. How can you not be familiar with the standard commercial model ?

 

Mr Jones talks about tragedies. Yet the real tragedy is that he and his colleagues have some emotional dependency on what the retail price of eBooks are rather than the total revenue earned from them. What that happens to any industry it is in real trouble. It is also in real trouble if it thinks that it's lazy, stagnant, over paid, inefficient business models have to be supported by high prices. It is no wonder most people with any insight are signalling the end of the days of the Big Publishers.

 

Perhaps Mr Jones et al have lived for too long in the surreal world of Big Publishers where commercial rules and the rights of consumers have been ignored for too long. But now it's changing. The consumer will no longer tolerate this kind of arrogant Price Fixing. The US, UK and EU are bearing down their necks with a chopping knife. The consumer has also discovered that titles that get the approval of Big Publishers have not guaranteed quality in the past, and the new waves of self published titles are delivering the same quality.

new car

Philip Jones's picture

hi howard, I'd like to buy a new car for £5. Can you let me know when I can pick it up, I am free Saturday. Thanks.

Market Value

Philip

Wanting to buy something, as an individual, for a much reduced price is not the same as the price consumers are willing to pay for it. Since when have producers started to dictate to retailers the price a customer pays for anything?

newspaper

Philip Jones's picture

Urm, everytime I buy the Guardian from my local shop I pay the price the producer puts on the product. Howard seems to think he should set the price for e-books, but actually it should be a dynamic between the customer and the supplier. If e-book buyers are not willing to pay the price publishers want to charge, then obviously they will come down in price, same as in the print world.

Under agency publishers become the suppliers as well as the producer. There's nothing to stop publisher A lowering the price if they want to attract more buyers; but maybe they want to achieve a fair price that rewards the supply chain. I don't know anything about Howard, but I suspect in his world there is simply the author and the reader and nothing in-between. He may want it to be like that but I still think we'll need publishers, booksellers, editors etc.

Also Howard is dismissive of "insiders". I don't get the logic. These insiders are the people who run multi-million pound businesses that deliver sucesses such as Emma Donoghue and Edmund de Waal: they are the underpaid editors who champion great writing everyday, and the publicists and marketing people who reach out to readers and get them in touch with great authors they won't have heard of before, they are the booksellers who hand-sell great content every day to customers in their shops. Howard seems to think that e makes all these people stupid. It doesn't.

A lower price does not necessarily mean lower quality...

iwritereadrate.com's picture

 

Hi Philip.  Interesting article - thanks for posting, I enjoyed reading it.

I think the points you raise are extremely valid - particularly in relation to how eBooks are generally priced from the major publishers.  I read an article recently about the obscure back/cross/subsidised way that books (electronic & printed) are commercially modelled by publishers and retailers - seemed overly complicated to me.

In my opinion what Indie Publishing and lower prices mean for writers is a simpler, easier model to work with; and very often a higher percentage of the cover price of their work.

I agree that there will undoubtedly be work out there, under the Indie eBook model, that is of dubious quality, however the cream always rises to the top - readers themselves can now make the decisions about what is good, or not, through their purchasing decisions.

A lower price does not necessarily mean lower quality; certainly not when this price is set by the writer/author themselves.  I also believe that there will always be a place for a price premium for the professionally published work.

I posted an article on our blog yesterday entitled 'The eBook Revolution'.  Maybe worth a look, maybe not: blog.iwritereadrate.com/?p=246

Saturn - agree with you on this, high pricing, proprietary DRM and sandboxed file formats are not good for writers or readers, and they have the affect of potentially creating more widespread piracy of eBooks than would otherwise be worth doing.

All the best

Adam Charles

iWriteReadRate.com

 

The customer is always right

In the end, the price will be what people perceive it should be. If infested with DRM or too expensive, the books will likely be pirated. This is what seems to be happening now. The longer the publishers wait accepting the inevitable, the more money they lose. Just look at what happened to the MS-DOS programs in the late 70ies and recently with mp3.

 

Post new comment

You will need to register to comment on Futurebook.net. Register here This will take less than a minute.
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. comments go live immediately, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive.
Enter your FutureBook username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <b> <i> <strong> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.