Less is more for publishers

I'm sure like many digital enthusiasts I have been spending much time recently reading/playing/hell just absorbing the brilliant children's app by William Joyce, a well-known illustrator and animator who has worked for Pixar, Dreamworks, Disney, and the New Yorker.

Released a month ago, The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore is currently the second most popular paid app - the only book app in the top 40  - and is the top paid for book app.  According to a tweet put out by the company that made it, Moonbot Studios, the app has just gone viral, after a steady string of stellar reviews: "Today shall go on the record as EPIC! A. Our lil buddy @MorrisLessmore had a big day!"

Ironically, Morris Lessmore is a story of people who devote their lives to books and books who return the favour. But publishers might fret that book apps such as this are doing them no favours at all: since they are bolder and better put together than most of the apps coming out of traditional publishers.

There are more ironies for publishers to enjoy too. The app tells the tale of a downtrodden bookworm who finds refuge in a house full of animated books. MoonBat calls it a "reinvention of digital storytelling", in it you can repair books, tumble through a storm, learn the piano and even get lost in a book flying through a magical world of words, giving you a dynamic journey through the story.

The app was based on an equally slick animated video. You'd expect that to be good, given the source. But irritatingly, the text is also a winner. Kirkus Reviews wrote this about it: "Though the app's text is all original (the short film features no dialogue or voice over, only music), it sparkles."

Reviews have used phrases such a "game-changer" that "will have readers rethinking their engagement with the device as a storytelling machine". The New York Times wrote that it could imagine "future books of this type with alternative narratives tailored to different age groups". MSNBC called it simply "the most stunning iPad app so far".

A parallel can be drawn between this and the blog I wrote earlier in the week about the rise of indie publishing (once called self-publishing). In the connected age there is a creative pulse that is giving life to new forms of books and new ways of getting them to content devourers: rather like how the camcorder and YouTube unleashed a wave of budding film-makers on an unsuspecting audience, and led to films such as "The Blair Witch Project" beating the big guys at their own game.

MoonBot calls itself a collective of outstanding individual talents that will sometimes create books. As I mentioned earlier in the week, indies will always rise, bring something out that is new and original and then fade somewhat into the background—"Blair Witch" director Daniel Myrick's last film was "The Objective", which made $93 on its opening weekend, his co-director Eduardo Sánchez's career has been equally shallow.

The worry for publishers its that they simply can't compete with this kind of initiative that is done ostensibly as a creative exercise rather than one that must feed the bottom line. But they could begin by aping MoonBot in its approach, if not its budget. I wonder, for instance, if there is a publisher in the land who yet thinks in the same platform-neutral way about their business as MoonBot does: it could be a book, it could be someting else entirely . . .

I expect to see plenty of articles written about how this spells the death of book publishing, again. But Morris Lessmore is a beacon for anyone interested in how to develop the creative word on a screen - and that includes most publishers I know.

Intriguingly, MoonBot Books says that a picture book version of The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore is in development. Less really is more in this world.

Tags:

Comments

This one sets the example for other book apps

Since I saw it in mid-June,  I've been mentioning that book app in writing and on the phone to anyone interested in book apps (or illustrator friends) as the app to see if a person needs to get an idea of the what this medium is all about. So much buzz about the Alice in Wonderland book app (I've read the director was even on talk shows), and all it did was incorporate the ipad "gimmicks" into a page ot text. But Moonbot not only created a very heart-felt message for all of us book-lovers (a story any print publisher would have loved anyway), but really understood what book apps can really be: their possibilities in storytelling and involving readers in a new way.

Now I'm not sure I agree with some of the phrases in this post: I don't see Moonbot thinking in a "platform-neutral" way. Quite the opposite. I think it's precisely the traditional print publishers who think they can pump out the same product in endless ways, adding little to it -in terms of creating a product specifically tailored to each platform or media. The licenses and intellectual product of these big companies become  platform-neutral, because they're not specifically tailored (which requires creativity above all, and choosing the right person to be in charge of this development ) regarding all the possibilities each media offers. Think of transmedia, for example. If each new media in which a story developed added nothing new, except a few gimmicks, then the audience wouldn't bother to check the story out in the rest of these other media (unless they are freaky fans of the story).

Also, if you go on Moonbot's webpage and see the amount of staff they have, I also doubt this is a "creative exercise", because they have to pay those salaries! It would be very interesting if  Futurebook could get Moonbot to reveal sales figures (or at least the amont of units sold) so far! That might dispell the idea that their their app sales cannot "feed the bottom line" (like you say), as a big Publishing House would be interested in doing.

Critical reviews on book apps

I think having high standards in book app reviews is what may whiplash multinational publishing houses into putting some more effort and getting book apps right:  I'd like to point you to the review of this Moonbot's book app on a new blog with critical reviews on children's book apps: CuratingAppMom.blogspot.com

If the School Library Journal and others in the Children's Media Conference have stated that book apps require reviews and recommendations for users (that go beyond using a lot of adjectives, and saying "my kid loved it") then a set of criteria for evaluation need to be established. I'd rate Morris Lessmore as 100, and then go from there down....

Post new comment

You will need to register to comment on Futurebook.net. Register here This will take less than a minute.
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. comments go live immediately, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive.
Enter your FutureBook username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <b> <i> <strong> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.